Crime & Conflict
Ejiofor Calls for State of Emergency in Katsina Over Release of 70 Bandits, Warns Against “Selective Justice” in Terror War

Human rights lawyer and constitutional advocate, Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor, has issued a strong call for the immediate declaration of a state of emergency in Katsina State, following reports that no fewer than 70 apprehended bandits and terrorists were recently released by state authorities.
Ejiofor’s call comes amid growing national debate over Nigeria’s counter-terrorism strategy, particularly the balance between military action, negotiation, rehabilitation, and accountability in regions ravaged by banditry and insurgency.
The senior lawyer made his position known in a statement shared on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday, reacting to recent reports that the Minister of Defence, General Christopher Musa (Rtd), had issued a stern warning to Sheikh Ahmad Gumi and other individuals perceived to be sympathetic to terrorist and bandit groups operating across northern Nigeria.
While welcoming the Defence Minister’s tough rhetoric, Ejiofor warned that strong words without consistent institutional action risk undermining the credibility of Nigeria’s war against terror.
Support for Defence Minister, But With a Caveat
Ejiofor acknowledged the importance of the Defence Minister’s warning, describing General Musa as a committed national security leader whose intentions were not in doubt. However, he stressed that national security cannot be enforced selectively or symbolically.
“The Minister of Defence, Christopher Musa, is reported to have issued a stern warning to Sheikh Gumi and other individuals perceived to be sympathetic to terrorist elements,” Ejiofor stated.
While welcoming the declaration, he added:
“May I, with the greatest respect to the Honourable Minister of Defence, whose commitment to national security is not in doubt, observe that it is imperative for this warning to be matched with institutional candour and moral consistency.”
According to Ejiofor, Nigeria’s counter-terrorism framework risks losing legitimacy if public warnings are not backed by consistent enforcement across all levels of government.
Allegations Against Katsina State Government
Central to Ejiofor’s argument is the recent release of at least 70 apprehended bandits and terror suspects in Katsina State, an action he described as deeply troubling and potentially dangerous to national security.
He argued that such decisions, regardless of their stated motivations, send a contradictory message to both criminal groups and law-abiding citizens.
“If the Federal Government is truly resolved to identify and decisively act against enablers, promoters, and facilitators of terrorism and banditry, then such inquiries must not be selectively directed at a few pronounced elements while glaring official actions are overlooked,” he said.
Ejiofor specifically urged the Defence Minister to expand investigative scrutiny to state-level actions, particularly those that appear to undermine federal counter-terrorism objectives.
“The Minister would do well to extend his investigative lens to the Katsina State Government, which, by its own acknowledged actions, has recently released no fewer than seventy apprehended bandits and terrorists, with indications that more may yet be freed,” he warned.
Call for State of Emergency in Katsina
In one of the strongest parts of his statement, Ejiofor declared that Katsina State has reached a critical security threshold requiring extraordinary constitutional intervention.
“That state is now overripe for the immediate declaration of a state of emergency,” he said.
According to him, the scale of insecurity, coupled with the release of suspected criminals, suggests a breakdown in governance mechanisms responsible for protecting lives and property.
Ejiofor argued that emergency rule, if properly implemented within constitutional limits, could restore coordination, accountability, and urgency in addressing the security crisis.
Warning Against Normalising Terrorism
The human rights lawyer cautioned that releasing suspected terrorists without transparent legal processes could embolden criminal networks, weaken deterrence, and fuel further violence.
“Such acts, whatever their stated motivations, risk transcending mere accommodation and veering into tacit endorsement,” he said.
He added that such actions:
“Embolden criminal networks, weaken deterrence, and send a deeply troubling signal to law-abiding Nigerians who daily bear the brunt of insecurity.”
Ejiofor stressed that victims of banditry—especially rural communities—may feel abandoned when those accused of terror-related crimes are reintegrated without accountability or restitution.
Contradictions in Nigeria’s Counter-Terrorism Approach
One of the key themes of Ejiofor’s intervention was what he described as a fundamental contradiction in Nigeria’s security strategy: threatening civilians accused of collaboration while allegedly rehabilitating armed criminals without transparent justice mechanisms.
“One cannot, on the one hand, threaten severe consequences for alleged civilian collaborators, while, on the other hand, legitimising or normalising the reintegration of armed criminals without transparent accountability, justice, or restitution,” he argued.
According to him, such inconsistencies weaken public confidence in the rule of law and may incentivize criminality by suggesting that violence carries negotiable consequences.
Actions Must Match Words
Ejiofor emphasized that Nigeria’s war against terrorism cannot be won by statements alone, no matter how forceful.
“Actions, after all, speak louder than proclamations,” he said.
He warned that when the state appears to reward or rehabilitate violent actors without consequences, it inadvertently teaches criminal groups that armed violence is a viable bargaining tool.
“When the state itself appears to reward or rehabilitate terror without consequence, it not only enables these actors but inadvertently teaches them, by example, that violence carries negotiable penalties,” Ejiofor stated.
Credibility of Nigeria’s War on Terror at Stake
In his concluding remarks, the lawyer argued that Nigeria’s counter-terrorism campaign will only command domestic and international respect when leaders and institutions are held accountable at all levels.
“Nigeria’s war against terror will only be credible when responsibility is demanded at all levels, and when those in authority are held to the same, if not higher, standards than the citizens they govern,” he said.
He warned that anything short of this risks reducing high-profile warnings and declarations to mere rhetoric, disconnected from the realities faced by communities under constant threat.
Growing National Debate
Ejiofor’s comments reflect a broader national conversation about amnesty programmes, negotiated settlements, and rehabilitation initiatives for bandits and insurgents, especially in the North-West and North-Central regions.
While some argue that dialogue and reintegration are necessary to end cycles of violence, critics insist that justice, accountability, and deterrence must not be sacrificed, particularly where mass killings, kidnappings, and displacement have occurred.
As Nigeria continues to battle insecurity on multiple fronts, the tension between security pragmatism and rule of law remains one of the most pressing challenges confronting the nation.
Crime & Conflict
Lawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges

Lawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges
Lawyers representing two defendants facing corruption-related charges have asked the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to remove their clients’ names and photographs from media publications linked to their ongoing criminal trial.
The lawyers argued that publishing the identities of the defendants in connection with the allegations could damage their reputations and create the impression that they had already been found guilty before the court reached a verdict.
The petition was submitted by J Aboje & Co., also known as Compass Chambers, on behalf of Folashade Oketope, a former chairwoman of the committee responsible for the sale of Federal Government houses in Abuja, and Mohammed Kabir Usman, a staff member of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA).
In a letter dated October 13, 2026, and addressed to the EFCC chairman, the law firm described the publications as an infringement on its clients’ constitutional rights, particularly the presumption of innocence and the right to dignity.
Lawyers Cite Presumption of Innocence
According to the petition, the letter followed an earlier correspondence dated July 28, 2026, concerning the publication of the defendants’ arraignment.
Oketope and Usman were arraigned before the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Jabi, Abuja, on July 13, 2026, on a three-count charge involving alleged conspiracy, breach of trust, corruption and the unlawful sale of government properties.
The allegations relate to the sale of four properties identified as Houses 3, 4, 7 and 8 at Plot 756, Abubakar Usman Crescent, Jabi, Abuja.
Oketope previously chaired the committee responsible for the sale of Federal Government houses in Abuja, while Usman was an FCTA employee seconded to the committee.
Their lawyers maintain that the defendants have not been convicted and should not be publicly portrayed as criminals while the case remains before the court.
The legal team also questioned whether the EFCC obtained permission from the court before publishing their clients’ names and photographs.
In the petition, the lawyers challenged the commission to explain whether it would apologise and withdraw the publications if the defendants were eventually acquitted.
Dispute Over Government Properties
The lawyers also referred to a separate case, identified as FCT/HC/CV/4094/2025, which they said was pending when the criminal proceedings began.
According to the petition, the separate suit concerns whether the properties in question belonged to the Federal Government and whether the committee could lawfully dispose of them.
The lawyers argued that the unresolved issues surrounding the ownership and sale of the properties should be considered alongside the criminal proceedings.
They urged the EFCC chairman to direct the removal of the disputed publications from all platforms where they appeared.
The legal team maintained that the defendants should be allowed to defend themselves in court without being subjected to what they described as prejudicial public exposure.
EFCC Reviewing Petition
The EFCC had not publicly responded to the specific allegations in the petition as of the time of the report.
However, a senior commission official, who spoke anonymously because they were not authorised to comment publicly, confirmed that the agency had received the petition.
The official reportedly said the commission’s legal team was reviewing the matter.
The dispute highlights the debate over how anti-corruption agencies communicate information about ongoing prosecutions while respecting the rights of defendants who have not been convicted.
For now, the request to remove the photographs remains a demand by the defendants’ lawyers, and the outcome of the ongoing court proceedings will determine the criminal allegations against their clients.
Crime & Conflict
₦110.4bn Fraud Trial: Witness Explains ₦1.425bn Forex Transactions Linked to Yahaya Bello Case

A bureeau de change operator, Jamilu Abdullahi, has told a court in Abuja that he handled foreign exchange transactions worth ₦1.425 billion on behalf of Abba Adaudu between December 2021 and February 2022.
Abdullahi, the 19th prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, gave the testimony on Thursday, October 15, 2026, before Justice Maryanne Anineh of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama, Abuja.
According to the witness, the transactions involved funds deposited into accounts associated with him and his company, Kunfayakun Global Limited. He told the court that the money was used to purchase foreign currencies, which he subsequently delivered to Adaudu.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Bello alongside Umar Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu over an alleged ₦110.4 billion fraud and money laundering scheme. The defendants are facing a 16-count charge.
Witness Explains Bank Transactions
While being led in evidence by prosecution counsel Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, Abdullahi identified several bank deposits and transfers recorded in accounts linked to him and his company.
He explained that some deposits of ₦10 million each made through a bank branch in Lokoja were connected to foreign exchange transactions arranged by Adaudu.
The witness maintained that the payments were not gifts but funds intended for purchasing United States dollars.
However, when questioned about other deposits recorded in his name, including transactions of ₦9 million and ₦8 million, Abdullahi denied making the deposits personally.
He told the court that he had never visited the Lokoja branch where some of the transactions were recorded, adding that his name could appear in transaction records as a beneficiary even when another person initiated the payment.
Abdullahi also identified several transfers involving companies he said were associated with Adaudu. He maintained that the funds were used for foreign exchange transactions and that he delivered the purchased currencies to Adaudu.
Witness Discusses School Fee Payments
The court also heard testimony concerning payments made to the American International School, Abuja.
Abdullahi said he processed school fee payments using account details and instructions provided by Adaudu. He identified Fatima Bello, Zahra Bello and Na’ima Bello as names familiar to him in connection with the transactions.
He further identified receipts presented in court as evidence of payments made to the school, explaining that he forwarded the receipts to Adaudu after completing the transactions.
During cross-examination by Abdullahi Yahaya, SAN, counsel to the first and second defendants, the witness said he had no direct dealings with any of the defendants.
When asked about the total amount he handed over to Adaudu, Abdullahi said he could not remember the exact figure because of the numerous transactions involved.
Court Adjourns Trial
Following the testimony, Justice Anineh adjourned the case until October 27 and November 24, 2026, for the continuation of proceedings.
The EFCC’s case centres on allegations that public funds belonging to Kogi State were unlawfully diverted and laundered. Bello and his co-defendants are facing prosecution over the allegations, which remain before the court.
The latest testimony forms part of the prosecution’s evidence in the ongoing trial. The allegations have yet to be determined by the court.
Crime & Conflict
Lagos Court Sentences Six Men to Two Years in Prison for Assaulting KAI Officers

A Magistrate Court sitting in Bolade, Oshodi, Lagos State, has sentenced six men to two years in prison each for assaulting officials of the Lagos State Environmental Sanitation Corps, popularly known as Kick Against Indiscipline (KAI).
The conviction was announced on Thursday, October 15, 2026, by the Lagos State Commissioner for the Environment and Water Resources, Tokunbo Wahab.
According to Wahab, the six men were arrested in the Alakija area of Lagos on October 10 following an incident involving the assault of KAI officers who were carrying out their official duties.
The suspects were subsequently arraigned before the Magistrate Court in Bolade, Oshodi, where they pleaded guilty to the charges against them.
Following their guilty pleas, the court convicted each of the defendants and sentenced them to two years’ imprisonment.
The convicted men were identified as Ghadafi Ismail, Balarabe Mustapha, Usman Danladi, Abdullahi Bello, Kamala Garuba and Musa Idris.
Reacting to the development, Wahab stressed the importance of respecting public officials who carry out lawful duties on behalf of the government.
He warned that the Lagos State Government would not tolerate violence against enforcement officers, adding that offenders would face the consequences of their actions under the law.
The commissioner also urged residents to allow government officials to perform their statutory responsibilities without intimidation, obstruction or physical attacks.
The development underscores the state government’s position on protecting public officers and enforcing environmental regulations across Lagos State.
Crime & Conflict2 days agoEl-Rufai Faces Fresh Allegations as Witness Tells Court of $600,000 EFCC Payment Plan
Terrorism & Insurgency2 days agoRibadu Raises Alarm as Terrorists Turn to AI, Cryptocurrency and Drones
Breaking Security News2 days ago2027 Elections: Timi Frank Asks Trump to Send US Delegation to Nigeria
Breaking Security News2 days agoINEC Explains Why Pantami, Adebutu Were Omitted From 2027 Governorship Candidates List
Crime & Conflict8 hours ago₦110.4bn Fraud Trial: Witness Explains ₦1.425bn Forex Transactions Linked to Yahaya Bello Case
Terrorism & Insurgency7 hours agoBandits Demand ₦500 Million Ransom for Pregnant Woman Abducted in Kaduna
Crime & Conflict8 hours agoLagos Court Sentences Six Men to Two Years in Prison for Assaulting KAI Officers
Crime & Conflict7 hours agoLawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges









