Connect with us

Crime & Conflict

Two Killed as Bandits Attack Wedding Convoy in Katsina Amid Controversial Pardon Plans

Published

on

Two Killed as Bandits Attack Wedding Convoy in Katsina Amid Controversial Pardon Plans

Suspected bandits have attacked a wedding convoy in Unguwar Nagunda, Kankara Local Government Area of Katsina State, leaving at least two people dead, several others injured, and an undetermined number of guests abducted.

The incident has triggered fresh outrage and fear among residents, coming at a time when the Katsina State Government is preparing to pardon dozens of detained bandit suspects, citing improved security conditions following peace negotiations in several local government areas.

Wedding Celebration Turns Deadly

According to Katsina-based security analyst Malam Bakatsine, the attackers stormed the convoy amid heavy gunfire, causing widespread panic as guests attempted to flee.

“At least two people were killed in the attack. Several others, including the bride, sustained injuries, while an unknown number of wedding guests were abducted,” Bakatsine said.

He added that families were still struggling to confirm the exact number of people taken away by the assailants as of the following morning.

Residents of Unguwar Nagunda, as well as nearby communities in Mabai and other parts of Kankara and neighbouring local government areas, say they continue to experience sporadic attacks, killings, and abductions despite official claims of improved security.

Silence From Police Command

Efforts to obtain official comments from the Katsina State Police Command were unsuccessful. Calls and messages sent to the Police Public Relations Officer, DSP Abubakar Sadiq, were not returned as of the time of filing this report.

The absence of an immediate police response has further heightened anxiety among residents, many of whom fear renewed waves of violence.

Controversy Over Planned Bandit Pardons

The attack has intensified public debate over the state government’s plan to secure the release of about 70 detained bandit suspects as part of ongoing peace arrangements.

Earlier reports revealed the existence of a classified letter dated January 2, 2026, issued by the Katsina State Ministry of Justice and addressed to the Chief Judge of the state, requesting judicial intervention to facilitate the release of suspects facing trial for banditry-related offences.

The letter, marked “SECRET” and signed by Director of Public Prosecutions Abdur-Rahman Umar, disclosed that:

  • 48 suspects awaiting trial at various Magistrate Courts were listed for release
  • An additional 22 suspects facing trial at High Courts were also included
  • The request was presented as a condition for sustaining peace accords between bandits and affected local governments

The Ministry cited provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Katsina State, 2021, arguing that the Criminal Justice Monitoring Committee has the statutory authority to intervene.

Government Defends Peace Strategy

In response to public backlash, Commissioner for Internal Security and Home Affairs, Nasir Muazu, defended the initiative, stating that the move was aimed at consolidating peace agreements reached with armed groups across at least 15 local government areas.

Muazu claimed the broader peace framework had already contributed to the release of approximately 1,000 abducted persons, describing the arrangement as similar to prisoner exchanges during wartime.

According to him, the government believes the strategy has produced measurable security gains.

Public Outrage and Legal Concerns

Despite the government’s assurances, the planned release has sparked strong opposition from legal practitioners, civil society organisations, and security analysts.

Critics argue that:

  • Releasing suspects already standing trial undermines the rule of law
  • Victims of banditry may be denied justice
  • The policy could embolden armed groups and encourage future violence

Many residents say the wedding convoy attack highlights the disconnect between official narratives and realities on the ground, questioning whether peace accords are being implemented prematurely.

Rising Tensions

As families mourn the dead and search for abducted loved ones, calls are growing for:

  • Greater transparency in peace negotiations
  • Stronger security deployments in vulnerable communities
  • Accountability mechanisms for crimes already committed

For now, fear and uncertainty continue to grip Kankara and surrounding areas, with residents demanding concrete action to protect lives rather than promises of peace that have yet to translate into safety.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crime & Conflict

Lawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges

Published

on

Lawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges

Lawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges

Lawyers representing two defendants facing corruption-related charges have asked the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to remove their clients’ names and photographs from media publications linked to their ongoing criminal trial.

The lawyers argued that publishing the identities of the defendants in connection with the allegations could damage their reputations and create the impression that they had already been found guilty before the court reached a verdict.

The petition was submitted by J Aboje & Co., also known as Compass Chambers, on behalf of Folashade Oketope, a former chairwoman of the committee responsible for the sale of Federal Government houses in Abuja, and Mohammed Kabir Usman, a staff member of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA).

In a letter dated October 13, 2026, and addressed to the EFCC chairman, the law firm described the publications as an infringement on its clients’ constitutional rights, particularly the presumption of innocence and the right to dignity.

Lawyers Cite Presumption of Innocence

According to the petition, the letter followed an earlier correspondence dated July 28, 2026, concerning the publication of the defendants’ arraignment.

Oketope and Usman were arraigned before the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Jabi, Abuja, on July 13, 2026, on a three-count charge involving alleged conspiracy, breach of trust, corruption and the unlawful sale of government properties.

The allegations relate to the sale of four properties identified as Houses 3, 4, 7 and 8 at Plot 756, Abubakar Usman Crescent, Jabi, Abuja.

Oketope previously chaired the committee responsible for the sale of Federal Government houses in Abuja, while Usman was an FCTA employee seconded to the committee.

Their lawyers maintain that the defendants have not been convicted and should not be publicly portrayed as criminals while the case remains before the court.

The legal team also questioned whether the EFCC obtained permission from the court before publishing their clients’ names and photographs.

In the petition, the lawyers challenged the commission to explain whether it would apologise and withdraw the publications if the defendants were eventually acquitted.

Dispute Over Government Properties

The lawyers also referred to a separate case, identified as FCT/HC/CV/4094/2025, which they said was pending when the criminal proceedings began.

According to the petition, the separate suit concerns whether the properties in question belonged to the Federal Government and whether the committee could lawfully dispose of them.

The lawyers argued that the unresolved issues surrounding the ownership and sale of the properties should be considered alongside the criminal proceedings.

They urged the EFCC chairman to direct the removal of the disputed publications from all platforms where they appeared.

The legal team maintained that the defendants should be allowed to defend themselves in court without being subjected to what they described as prejudicial public exposure.

EFCC Reviewing Petition

The EFCC had not publicly responded to the specific allegations in the petition as of the time of the report.

However, a senior commission official, who spoke anonymously because they were not authorised to comment publicly, confirmed that the agency had received the petition.

The official reportedly said the commission’s legal team was reviewing the matter.

The dispute highlights the debate over how anti-corruption agencies communicate information about ongoing prosecutions while respecting the rights of defendants who have not been convicted.

For now, the request to remove the photographs remains a demand by the defendants’ lawyers, and the outcome of the ongoing court proceedings will determine the criminal allegations against their clients.

Continue Reading

Crime & Conflict

₦110.4bn Fraud Trial: Witness Explains ₦1.425bn Forex Transactions Linked to Yahaya Bello Case

Published

on

₦110.4bn Fraud Trial: Witness Explains ₦1.425bn Forex Transactions Linked to Yahaya Bello Case

A bureeau de change operator, Jamilu Abdullahi, has told a court in Abuja that he handled foreign exchange transactions worth ₦1.425 billion on behalf of Abba Adaudu between December 2021 and February 2022.

Abdullahi, the 19th prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, gave the testimony on Thursday, October 15, 2026, before Justice Maryanne Anineh of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama, Abuja.

According to the witness, the transactions involved funds deposited into accounts associated with him and his company, Kunfayakun Global Limited. He told the court that the money was used to purchase foreign currencies, which he subsequently delivered to Adaudu.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Bello alongside Umar Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu over an alleged ₦110.4 billion fraud and money laundering scheme. The defendants are facing a 16-count charge.

Witness Explains Bank Transactions

While being led in evidence by prosecution counsel Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, Abdullahi identified several bank deposits and transfers recorded in accounts linked to him and his company.

He explained that some deposits of ₦10 million each made through a bank branch in Lokoja were connected to foreign exchange transactions arranged by Adaudu.

The witness maintained that the payments were not gifts but funds intended for purchasing United States dollars.

However, when questioned about other deposits recorded in his name, including transactions of ₦9 million and ₦8 million, Abdullahi denied making the deposits personally.

He told the court that he had never visited the Lokoja branch where some of the transactions were recorded, adding that his name could appear in transaction records as a beneficiary even when another person initiated the payment.

Abdullahi also identified several transfers involving companies he said were associated with Adaudu. He maintained that the funds were used for foreign exchange transactions and that he delivered the purchased currencies to Adaudu.

Witness Discusses School Fee Payments

The court also heard testimony concerning payments made to the American International School, Abuja.

Abdullahi said he processed school fee payments using account details and instructions provided by Adaudu. He identified Fatima Bello, Zahra Bello and Na’ima Bello as names familiar to him in connection with the transactions.

He further identified receipts presented in court as evidence of payments made to the school, explaining that he forwarded the receipts to Adaudu after completing the transactions.

During cross-examination by Abdullahi Yahaya, SAN, counsel to the first and second defendants, the witness said he had no direct dealings with any of the defendants.

When asked about the total amount he handed over to Adaudu, Abdullahi said he could not remember the exact figure because of the numerous transactions involved.

Court Adjourns Trial

Following the testimony, Justice Anineh adjourned the case until October 27 and November 24, 2026, for the continuation of proceedings.

The EFCC’s case centres on allegations that public funds belonging to Kogi State were unlawfully diverted and laundered. Bello and his co-defendants are facing prosecution over the allegations, which remain before the court.

The latest testimony forms part of the prosecution’s evidence in the ongoing trial. The allegations have yet to be determined by the court.

Continue Reading

Crime & Conflict

Lagos Court Sentences Six Men to Two Years in Prison for Assaulting KAI Officers

Published

on

Lagos Court Sentences Six Men to Two Years in Prison for Assaulting KAI Officers

A Magistrate Court sitting in Bolade, Oshodi, Lagos State, has sentenced six men to two years in prison each for assaulting officials of the Lagos State Environmental Sanitation Corps, popularly known as Kick Against Indiscipline (KAI).

The conviction was announced on Thursday, October 15, 2026, by the Lagos State Commissioner for the Environment and Water Resources, Tokunbo Wahab.

According to Wahab, the six men were arrested in the Alakija area of Lagos on October 10 following an incident involving the assault of KAI officers who were carrying out their official duties.

The suspects were subsequently arraigned before the Magistrate Court in Bolade, Oshodi, where they pleaded guilty to the charges against them.

Following their guilty pleas, the court convicted each of the defendants and sentenced them to two years’ imprisonment.

The convicted men were identified as Ghadafi Ismail, Balarabe Mustapha, Usman Danladi, Abdullahi Bello, Kamala Garuba and Musa Idris.

Reacting to the development, Wahab stressed the importance of respecting public officials who carry out lawful duties on behalf of the government.

He warned that the Lagos State Government would not tolerate violence against enforcement officers, adding that offenders would face the consequences of their actions under the law.

The commissioner also urged residents to allow government officials to perform their statutory responsibilities without intimidation, obstruction or physical attacks.

The development underscores the state government’s position on protecting public officers and enforcing environmental regulations across Lagos State.

Continue Reading

Trending