Connect with us

Crime & Conflict

Shehu Sani: Bandits and Terrorists Are Not Foreigners, Northern Leaders Must Own the Solution

Published

on

Shehu Sani: Bandits and Terrorists Are Not Foreigners, Northern Leaders Must Own the Solution

Former Senator representing Kaduna Central, Shehu Sani, has reignited a sensitive but crucial debate on Nigeria’s insecurity, insisting that terrorists and bandits terrorising the North-East and North-West are not foreign fighters, but largely locals drawn from within the region. His remarks challenge a long-standing narrative that insecurity in northern Nigeria is primarily driven by external actors crossing porous borders.

Speaking during a public discussion on insecurity, Sani argued that progress in tackling violence will remain elusive unless northern leaders confront what he described as an uncomfortable truth: the problem is homegrown and requires regional accountability.

Challenging the “Foreign Bandit” Narrative

For years, official and informal explanations for banditry and terrorism in northern Nigeria have often pointed to fighters from countries such as Mali, Niger, Libya, or other parts of West and Central Africa. While acknowledging the existence of cross-border criminal networks, Sani dismissed the idea that foreign fighters are the main drivers of violence.

According to him, such claims are misleading and risk deflecting responsibility.

“The terrorists killing people in the North-East are not from Congo, Malawi, Libya or Egypt; they are northerners, and they are Muslims. The bandits in the North-West are not from Senegal, Mali, Morocco or Guinea; they are Fulani from the North-West of Nigeria,” he said.

By naming ethnic and regional identities, Sani ventured into a politically and socially sensitive space, but framed his argument as a call for honesty rather than blame.

Language as Evidence of Local Roots

One of Sani’s strongest points was linguistic. He argued that the languages spoken by bandits and insurgents—Hausa, Fulfulde, and Kanuri—are indigenous to northern Nigeria, reinforcing the claim that these groups are locally rooted.

“They are not speaking Chinese or Spanish. These are our languages,” he said.

Security analysts note that language has long been a critical indicator in conflict analysis, often revealing recruitment patterns and operational bases. Sani’s argument aligns with intelligence assessments suggesting that many armed groups recruit from marginalized rural communities familiar with the terrain.

A Call for Regional Ownership

Beyond identifying the source of the problem, Sani placed responsibility squarely on northern political and traditional leadership. He stressed that sustainable solutions must come from within the region, rather than relying solely on federal military deployments or international partners.

His position reflects growing frustration over what critics describe as a cycle of denial, externalisation, and delayed action that has allowed insecurity to fester for over a decade.

“It is for us to solve this problem, not anybody else,” Sani said, urging leaders to design a regional security response grounded in accurate intelligence.

Reassessing the Scale of the Threat

In a claim that may surprise many Nigerians, Sani argued that the number of active bandits and terrorists is smaller than commonly believed.

“The total number of bandits and terrorists is not more than 5,000,” he said.

If accurate, this assessment suggests that the challenge is less about overwhelming numbers and more about coordination, intelligence gaps, local collaboration, and political will. Some analysts believe this reinforces the argument for targeted operations, community intelligence, and disruption of logistics and funding networks rather than broad, reactive military campaigns.

Political and Social Implications

Sani’s remarks carry significant political weight, especially coming from a former lawmaker and APC chieftain in Kaduna State. By rejecting the “outsider” explanation, he implicitly calls for a re-examination of issues such as:

  • Local collaboration and informants
  • Rural poverty and unemployment
  • Breakdown of traditional conflict-resolution mechanisms
  • Political complicity and silence

However, his statements also risk misinterpretation if stripped of context. Security experts caution that while many fighters may be local, the drivers of insecurity are complex and include arms proliferation, transnational criminal routes, climate pressure, and weak governance.

Conclusion

Shehu Sani’s intervention cuts through years of evasive rhetoric and places responsibility where it is most uncomfortable—within the region itself. His message is clear: as long as northern leaders continue to externalise the problem, insecurity will persist.

Whether his call will translate into coordinated regional action remains uncertain. But in a conflict landscape crowded with excuses, Sani’s insistence on honesty may prove to be one of the most politically consequential contributions to the national security debate in recent times.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crime & Conflict

Lawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges

Published

on

Lawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges

Lawyers Ask EFCC to Remove Photos of Clients Facing Corruption Charges

Lawyers representing two defendants facing corruption-related charges have asked the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to remove their clients’ names and photographs from media publications linked to their ongoing criminal trial.

The lawyers argued that publishing the identities of the defendants in connection with the allegations could damage their reputations and create the impression that they had already been found guilty before the court reached a verdict.

The petition was submitted by J Aboje & Co., also known as Compass Chambers, on behalf of Folashade Oketope, a former chairwoman of the committee responsible for the sale of Federal Government houses in Abuja, and Mohammed Kabir Usman, a staff member of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA).

In a letter dated October 13, 2026, and addressed to the EFCC chairman, the law firm described the publications as an infringement on its clients’ constitutional rights, particularly the presumption of innocence and the right to dignity.

Lawyers Cite Presumption of Innocence

According to the petition, the letter followed an earlier correspondence dated July 28, 2026, concerning the publication of the defendants’ arraignment.

Oketope and Usman were arraigned before the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Jabi, Abuja, on July 13, 2026, on a three-count charge involving alleged conspiracy, breach of trust, corruption and the unlawful sale of government properties.

The allegations relate to the sale of four properties identified as Houses 3, 4, 7 and 8 at Plot 756, Abubakar Usman Crescent, Jabi, Abuja.

Oketope previously chaired the committee responsible for the sale of Federal Government houses in Abuja, while Usman was an FCTA employee seconded to the committee.

Their lawyers maintain that the defendants have not been convicted and should not be publicly portrayed as criminals while the case remains before the court.

The legal team also questioned whether the EFCC obtained permission from the court before publishing their clients’ names and photographs.

In the petition, the lawyers challenged the commission to explain whether it would apologise and withdraw the publications if the defendants were eventually acquitted.

Dispute Over Government Properties

The lawyers also referred to a separate case, identified as FCT/HC/CV/4094/2025, which they said was pending when the criminal proceedings began.

According to the petition, the separate suit concerns whether the properties in question belonged to the Federal Government and whether the committee could lawfully dispose of them.

The lawyers argued that the unresolved issues surrounding the ownership and sale of the properties should be considered alongside the criminal proceedings.

They urged the EFCC chairman to direct the removal of the disputed publications from all platforms where they appeared.

The legal team maintained that the defendants should be allowed to defend themselves in court without being subjected to what they described as prejudicial public exposure.

EFCC Reviewing Petition

The EFCC had not publicly responded to the specific allegations in the petition as of the time of the report.

However, a senior commission official, who spoke anonymously because they were not authorised to comment publicly, confirmed that the agency had received the petition.

The official reportedly said the commission’s legal team was reviewing the matter.

The dispute highlights the debate over how anti-corruption agencies communicate information about ongoing prosecutions while respecting the rights of defendants who have not been convicted.

For now, the request to remove the photographs remains a demand by the defendants’ lawyers, and the outcome of the ongoing court proceedings will determine the criminal allegations against their clients.

Continue Reading

Crime & Conflict

₦110.4bn Fraud Trial: Witness Explains ₦1.425bn Forex Transactions Linked to Yahaya Bello Case

Published

on

₦110.4bn Fraud Trial: Witness Explains ₦1.425bn Forex Transactions Linked to Yahaya Bello Case

A bureeau de change operator, Jamilu Abdullahi, has told a court in Abuja that he handled foreign exchange transactions worth ₦1.425 billion on behalf of Abba Adaudu between December 2021 and February 2022.

Abdullahi, the 19th prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, gave the testimony on Thursday, October 15, 2026, before Justice Maryanne Anineh of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama, Abuja.

According to the witness, the transactions involved funds deposited into accounts associated with him and his company, Kunfayakun Global Limited. He told the court that the money was used to purchase foreign currencies, which he subsequently delivered to Adaudu.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Bello alongside Umar Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu over an alleged ₦110.4 billion fraud and money laundering scheme. The defendants are facing a 16-count charge.

Witness Explains Bank Transactions

While being led in evidence by prosecution counsel Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, Abdullahi identified several bank deposits and transfers recorded in accounts linked to him and his company.

He explained that some deposits of ₦10 million each made through a bank branch in Lokoja were connected to foreign exchange transactions arranged by Adaudu.

The witness maintained that the payments were not gifts but funds intended for purchasing United States dollars.

However, when questioned about other deposits recorded in his name, including transactions of ₦9 million and ₦8 million, Abdullahi denied making the deposits personally.

He told the court that he had never visited the Lokoja branch where some of the transactions were recorded, adding that his name could appear in transaction records as a beneficiary even when another person initiated the payment.

Abdullahi also identified several transfers involving companies he said were associated with Adaudu. He maintained that the funds were used for foreign exchange transactions and that he delivered the purchased currencies to Adaudu.

Witness Discusses School Fee Payments

The court also heard testimony concerning payments made to the American International School, Abuja.

Abdullahi said he processed school fee payments using account details and instructions provided by Adaudu. He identified Fatima Bello, Zahra Bello and Na’ima Bello as names familiar to him in connection with the transactions.

He further identified receipts presented in court as evidence of payments made to the school, explaining that he forwarded the receipts to Adaudu after completing the transactions.

During cross-examination by Abdullahi Yahaya, SAN, counsel to the first and second defendants, the witness said he had no direct dealings with any of the defendants.

When asked about the total amount he handed over to Adaudu, Abdullahi said he could not remember the exact figure because of the numerous transactions involved.

Court Adjourns Trial

Following the testimony, Justice Anineh adjourned the case until October 27 and November 24, 2026, for the continuation of proceedings.

The EFCC’s case centres on allegations that public funds belonging to Kogi State were unlawfully diverted and laundered. Bello and his co-defendants are facing prosecution over the allegations, which remain before the court.

The latest testimony forms part of the prosecution’s evidence in the ongoing trial. The allegations have yet to be determined by the court.

Continue Reading

Crime & Conflict

Lagos Court Sentences Six Men to Two Years in Prison for Assaulting KAI Officers

Published

on

Lagos Court Sentences Six Men to Two Years in Prison for Assaulting KAI Officers

A Magistrate Court sitting in Bolade, Oshodi, Lagos State, has sentenced six men to two years in prison each for assaulting officials of the Lagos State Environmental Sanitation Corps, popularly known as Kick Against Indiscipline (KAI).

The conviction was announced on Thursday, October 15, 2026, by the Lagos State Commissioner for the Environment and Water Resources, Tokunbo Wahab.

According to Wahab, the six men were arrested in the Alakija area of Lagos on October 10 following an incident involving the assault of KAI officers who were carrying out their official duties.

The suspects were subsequently arraigned before the Magistrate Court in Bolade, Oshodi, where they pleaded guilty to the charges against them.

Following their guilty pleas, the court convicted each of the defendants and sentenced them to two years’ imprisonment.

The convicted men were identified as Ghadafi Ismail, Balarabe Mustapha, Usman Danladi, Abdullahi Bello, Kamala Garuba and Musa Idris.

Reacting to the development, Wahab stressed the importance of respecting public officials who carry out lawful duties on behalf of the government.

He warned that the Lagos State Government would not tolerate violence against enforcement officers, adding that offenders would face the consequences of their actions under the law.

The commissioner also urged residents to allow government officials to perform their statutory responsibilities without intimidation, obstruction or physical attacks.

The development underscores the state government’s position on protecting public officers and enforcing environmental regulations across Lagos State.

Continue Reading

Trending